EPA proposes rainwater-trapping rules for D.C.
By David A. Fahrenthold
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 22, 2010
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced plans Wednesday to require “green roofs,” rain barrels and other measures that trap runoff at new and redeveloped buildings in the District, making the city a test case for an ambitious effort to stop pollution from flowing into rivers along with the rain.
The EPA’s plan, contained in a proposed permit for the District’s storm-sewer system, would require developers to trap 90 percent of the water that falls on a plot during a storm.
Water usually hits roofs and parking lots and runs into sewers, carrying trash and chemical pollutants. Under the permit, that water would be filtered naturally, through plants and dirt, or be caught in a receptacle for use watering plants.
If developers cannot make the changes, the EPA proposed, they would be required to pay for projects elsewhere.
The EPA will seek public comment on the plan, which would last five years. If approved, it would mean a major shift in thinking for a city covered in glass, concrete and shingles. EPA officials estimated that some buildings currently might trap 30 percent of rainwater with gardens or landscaping. At sites where the buildings are surrounded only by concrete, the number could be zero.
In the EPA’s plan, “you’re using water on site as an asset, rather than a waste product,” said Jon Capacasa, director of the water protection division of the EPA’s mid-Atlantic regional office. He said the changes were part of a larger effort, begun with a presidential order last year, to improve the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. “The local water bodies need these levels of [storm water] control to be healthy,” he said.
// Capacasa said the plan would make the District’s rules on rainwater among the strictest in the country.
In the past few months, Virginia and Maryland have proposed similar measures to trap and filter rainwater. But house builders and other developers said they would add vast new costs to their projects. Virginia shelved its plan, and Maryland made some alterations that developers demanded.
The EPA plan for the District would require developers to trap the first 1.2 inches of rain that falls during a storm (it would require federal buildings to trap the first 1.7 inches). In that way, it is more restrictive than the proposal that was shot down in Virginia, and tougher on redevelopment projects than Maryland’s rules are.
A D.C. Building Industries Association official said she could not comment Wednesday because she had not seen the details of the permit. An official with the D.C. government declined to comment for the same reason.
Rainwater is an unlikely sounding, but important, source of pollution for the Chesapeake, bringing down more than 10 percent of the two pollutants that cause “dead zones” downstream. Environmental groups applauded the EPA’s proposal Wednesday, saying it would also reduce the amount of mud and garbage washed down during storms.
“Less of that storm water flowing into the river is going to mean less trash,” said Brent C. Bolin of the Anacostia Watershed Society. “You’ll be able to see the difference.”
Bolg Author: I have been involved in Rain Water Harvesting for many years, and find it disturbing that “Water Works” is still held as a monopoly over the citizenry of this country. As if we are blind and not realizing, the life blood and value of our natural and sustainable resources. We all know by now that the existing infrastructure and water use laws are doomed to failure, yet maintained as highly profitable, but not sustainable.
Having a thorough understanding of this water quality crisis, I see too many problems within the DC environs. Especially striking is; the accounting of impervious concrete surfaces, which cover 65% of District land, equaling an area big enough to hold 175 Washington D.C. National Malls! As well, most of the Districts rooftops presently capture the rainwater, but then pipe it directly to the storm sewers. Therefore, the rainwater is not efficiently used for its intended biological purpose. It is as if rainwater is used to just clean the streets and flush pollutants and debris into the Anacostia and Potomac rivers. Even some Brick Sidewalks are first paved with concrete before the bricks are laid, preventing the natural filtration of surface water into the ground to keep the trees healthy, as well as naturally assist in providing a filtered water resource into the Anacostia and Potomac rivers.
There are many solutions available to resolve this problem.
We need to look beyond simple rain barrels and water gardens for individual home owners, so why put the onus on just the home owner? Nevertheless, the District should also promote commercial Rainwater Harvesting applications to reduce the stress on District’s water needs. In addition, Roof Top Gardens are not suitable for many structures in DC. However, a Rain Water Harvesting system is suitable, even if it is only legally used for agricultural, construction, and landscaping needs. Then of course; there are many other possible residential and commercial rainwater uses. Considering that now on the consumer market, there are 40-50 year guaranteed and cost effective designer roofing materials, these can provide clean water harvesting, fire safety, as well as added energy efficiencies. This alternative resource use in effect would provide hundreds of thousands jobs throughout this nation.
The list could go on and on. This is not just a DC crisis, but also a part of the global crisis.