Posted by: rainworks | December 16, 2010

Older City Water Infrastructures Lead Problems

Washington DC must do more to respond to the DC lead cover-up

By Dana Best and Marc Edwards

Sunday, July 4, 2010

We commend Thomas R. Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for his careful examination of the complex history of lead in the D.C. water supply [“Lead in D.C. water: Still more to do,” Local Opinions, June 27]. His commentary was a good start toward correcting the scientific record and healing the rift between District residents and the U.S. public health community. Unfortunately, the piece overlooked some key points.

First and foremost, as a result of lead-contaminated water, many D.C. children will never achieve their full potential. In 2009 we published a peer-reviewed scientific paper that showed that when water lead levels were elevated, several hundred and perhaps thousands of D.C. children were poisoned by lead because they drank contaminated tap water. Children exposed to even low levels of lead suffer permanent, irreversible harm. The neurological effects of lead poisoning can be partly abated by enriching the child’s environment, but the low-income neighborhoods in which water and blood lead levels were highest are the same ones with schools facing significant challenges.

Second, what happened in the District was far more serious than this piece suggested. As soon as the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority started to note the elevated water lead levels, it began to hide problems and play down potential health effects. If it hadn’t been for the work of reporters from The Post, D.C. residents might never have learned the full extent of dangers from the water supply. Once the story broke, the messages delivered to D.C. residents contained misinformation and tended to play down the risks of elevated lead in the water supply. Dr. Frieden’s commentary continued in this vein by presenting a skewed version of events in which the CDC is portrayed as a victim of D.C.’s poor data collection rather than the author of an inaccurate and misleading report.

Finally, Dr. Frieden’s commentary ignored the harm caused by the 2004 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. That report stated “that although lead in tap water contributed to a small increase” in blood lead levels in the District, no children were identified with blood lead levels greater than 10 micrograms per deciliter, “even in homes with the highest water lead levels.” Even though two addenda of the report have been published, the original erroneous conclusions stand. Decisions have been and continue to be made based on the report’s conclusions.

// For example, after the report was published in 2004, the D.C. Department of Health withdrew support for distribution of water filters to homes without a record of lead service lines. More recently, in 2008, the CDC findings were used by the D.C. Council to justify the elimination of all water-related language from the bill it passed to prevent lead poisoning. The impact of the report has been felt all over the United States and Canada by supporting assertions that lead in the water supply is less harmful than it is. As long as the report remains part of the scientific literature, it will continue to influence public policy and water supplies.

We understand that Dr. Frieden inherited this issue. We are not suggesting that he played any role in the CDC’s handling of the data or the reporting of misinformation. Nevertheless, we are concerned about the focus of his column and the continued presence of the flawed 2004 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report in the scientific literature. The CDC should remove this report from the scientific record immediately. A group of concerned scientists and parents made this request on May 20, repeated the request earlier this month, and as of today have not received a reply.

A change in the culture of the CDC is an important step toward improving the health of the District and our nation. Again, we commend Dr. Frieden for reexamining the D.C. lead-in-water crisis. We remain concerned about the perpetuation of misinformation released during the crisis. While the heads of the agencies and organizations involved have changed, many people with significant responsibility for the coverup of the elevated lead and associated harm to D.C. residents remain. Dr. Frieden seems to be hearing their voices without hearing ours.

Dana Best is a pediatrician working for Children’s National Medical Center and an associate professor of pediatrics at the George Washington University School of Medicine. Marc Edwards is a civil engineer and a professor at Virginia Tech.

Added Note by Rainworks Blog author: ITS SO BAD that Washington DC will not allow present day Brass plumbing fittings to be sold starting in 2011 due to the 1-3% lead content in old Brass. This places the onus more on the homeowner and the hardware stores than on the Old City Infrastructure. Although, DC has been slowly correcting the Lead problem at the street level. Still many homes  on Capital Hill have lead pipes in the home, and as well, underground  to the street.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. […] Older City Water Infrastructures Lead Problems « Rainworks Blog […]

    • Sure if you bought a Reverse Osmosis devise.

  2. Very interesting post! Looking forward to the next posts!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: